Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John M. York
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- John M. York (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This seems to be another run-of-the-mill state court intermediate appellate judge. Not a statewide office, and nothing more than typical local judicial offices. Being presiding judge of a municipal court is not an office of encyclopedic significance. BD2412 T 16:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and California. BD2412 T 16:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:28, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.